Customs Act, 1962 › Chapter XVII — Miscellaneous
Section 142. Recovery of sums due to Government
Customs Act, 1962
Bare Act
Recovery of sums due to Government. —
(1) Where any sum payable by any person under this Act including the amount required to be paid to the credit of the Central Government under section 28B is not paid, -
(a) the proper officer may deduct or may require any other officer of customs to deduct the amount so payable from any money owing to such person which may be under the control of the proper officer or such other officer of customs; or
(b) the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs may recover or may require any other officer of customs to recover the amount so payable by detaining and selling any goods belonging to such person which are under the control of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs or such other officer of customs; or 4 (c) if the amount cannot be recovered from such person in the manner provided in clause (a) or clause (b) -
(i) the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs may prepare a certificate signed by him specifying the amount due from such person and send it to the Collector of the district in which such person owns any property or resides or carries on his business and the said Collector on receipt of such certificate shall proceed to recover from such person the amount specified thereunder as if it were an arrear of land revenue; or
(ii) the proper officer may, on an authorisation by Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs and in accordance with the rules made in this behalf, distrain any movable or immovable property belonging to or under the control of such person, and detain the same until the amount payable is paid; and in case, any part of the said amount payable or of the cost of the distress or keeping of the property, remains unpaid for a period of thirty days next after any such distress, may cause the said property to be sold and with the proceeds of such sale, may satisfy the amount payable and the costs including cost of sale remaining unpaid and shall render the surplus, if any, to such person:
Provided that where the person (hereinafter referred to as predecessor), by whom any sum payable under this Act including the amount required to be paid to the credit of the Central Government under section 28B is not paid, transfers or otherwise disposes of his business or trade in whole or in part, or effects any change in the ownership thereof, in consequence of which he is succeeded in such business or trade by any other person, all goods, materials, preparations, plants, machineries, vessels, utensils, implements and articles in the custody or possession of the person so succeeding may also be attached and sold by the proper officer, after obtaining written approval from the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs, for the purposes of recovering the amount so payable by such predecessor at the time of such transfer or otherwise disposal or change.
(d) (i) the proper officer may, by a notice in writing, require any other person from whom money is due to such person or may become due to such person or who holds or may subsequently hold money for or on account of such person, to pay to the credit of the Central Government either forthwith upon the money becoming due or being held, or at or within the time specified in the notice not being before the money becomes due or is held, so much of the money as is sufficient to pay the amount due from such person or the whole of the money when it is equal to or less than that amount;
(ii) every person to whom the notice is issued under this section shall be bound to comply with such notice, and in particular, where any such notice is issued to a post office, banking company or an insurer, it shall not be necessary to produce any pass book, deposit receipt, policy or any other document for the purpose of any entry, endorsement or the like being made before the payment is made, notwithstanding any rule, practice or requirement to the contrary;
(iii) in case the person to whom a notice under this section has been issued, fails to make the payment in pursuance thereof to the Central Government, he shall be deemed to be a defaulter in respect of the amount specified in the notice and all the consequences of this Chapter shall follow.
(2) Where the terms of any bond or other instrument executed under this Act or any rules or regulations made thereunder provide that any amount due under such instrument may be recovered in the manner laid down in sub-section (1), the amount may, without prejudice to any other mode of recovery, be recovered in accordance with the provisions of that sub-section.
Judgments on Section 142
- Haji S International vs Commissioner Of Customs-Air Cargo… — CESTAT, 30 Apr 2026. Where the repealing 2017 Drawback Rules contain a specific saving provision in rule 20(2), section 159A of the Customs Act does not apply, and recovery of drawback under rule 16 or 16A of the repealed 1995 Rules cannot…
- Manasa Impex Services vs Commissioner Of Customs And Central Excise, Coimbatore) With — CESTAT, 21 Aug 2025. A customs broker's failure to perform duties under CHALR attracts disciplinary action under CHALR alone; a penalty under section 114 of the Customs Act requires proof of abetment or active collusion — involvement beyond…
- M/S Patanjali Foods Limited (Formerly Known As M/S Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd.) Appellant(S) Versus Union Of India vs Union Of India — Supreme Court of India, 19 May 2025. Encashment of a bank guarantee furnished merely as security pursuant to a court's interim order cannot be treated as duty 'paid' under Section 27 of the Customs Act, so the doctrine of unjust enrichment does not apply…
- Rajbir Singh vs Union Of India & Ors. — Delhi High Court, 8 Apr 2025. Where Rule 16 of the Duty Drawback Rules prescribes no period of limitation, the general three-year limitation cannot be presumed to apply by default, especially where there are strong suspicions of fraudulent availment…
- M/S Jairath International And Another vs Union Of India And Others — Punjab-Haryana High Court, 4 Oct 2019. The customs department has no power under Rule 16 of the Drawback Rules, 1995 or the Valuation Rules, 2007 to re-assess a shipping bill duly assessed at the time of export, because goods already exported are not 'export…
- M/S Nxtify Technologies Private… vs The Union Of India — Patna High Court, 11 Sep 2026. An extension of provisional attachment of a bank account under the proviso to Section 110(5) of the Customs Act, 1962 requires a pre-decisional hearing and reasons recorded in writing; an extension passed without…
- Raja Metal Corporation vs Chennai (Port Export) — CESTAT, 30 Sep 2025. Since the Customs Act, 1962 contains no machinery provision for proceeding against a deceased assessee's legal representatives, a demand of duty, interest or penalty cannot be pursued and the appeal abates under Rule 22…
- Kannur International Airport Ltd vs Cochin-Cus — CESTAT, 23 Sep 2025. Interest under Section 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962 is attracted only where the amount payable is 'duty' under Section 28, and therefore cannot be levied on cost recovery charges, which are not duty.
- Kbs Industries Ltd & Anr. vs The Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Settlement Commission Principal Bench New Delhi — Delhi High Court, 13 Jan 2025. An exemption notification issued under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 can validly impose, as a condition of exemption, liability to pay the duty leviable together with interest at 15% per annum from the date of…
- Industrial Dev.Bank Of India Through… vs Superintendent Of Central Excise And Customs — Supreme Court of India, 18 Aug 2023. Government dues under the Customs Act, even when preferential under Section 530 of the Companies Act, do not override the overriding preferential payments under Section 529A, so prior secured creditors may enforce their…
- M/S Famina Knit Fabs vs Union Of India And Others — Punjab-Haryana High Court, 20 Sep 2019. A demand of duty drawback as erroneously or excessively availed is bad in law where the rule invoked (Rule 16, Drawback Rules, 1995) prescribes no machinery or procedure for determining and demanding such drawback, and…
- Gujarat State Fertilizer Co Ltd vs Union Of India Thro — Gujarat High Court, 11 Mar 2013. A confirmed demand remains recoverable because a pending appeal is not a stay, but a recovery notice issued while the assessee's stay application is still undisposed of for reasons not attributable to the assessee…
- Commissioner Of Central Excise And Customs, Cochin Who Is The Third vs M/S.asianet Satellite Communications Limited — Madras High Court, 23 Feb 2011. A Settlement Commission's order passed on a full and true disclosure can be set aside only if it is contrary to the provisions of the Act and that contravention has prejudiced the party, since judicial review examines…
- Sri Vishnupriya Industries Ltd. (In… vs Superintendent Of Central Excise And Customs — Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana), 3 Sep 2004. A detention and sale of warehoused goods under Section 72(2) of the Customs Act without a proper demand under Section 72(1) and notice to the owner is non est and void ab initio, and where no sale has been effected…
- Indian Overseas Bank vs The Assistant Commissiooner Of Central… — Madras High Court, 3 Sep 2026
- Commissioner Of Customs -Ii Chennai vs M/S. Unik Traders — CESTAT, 21 Jul 2025. On the death of a sole proprietor, appeal proceedings abate under Rule 22 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 unless continued by his legal representative, and a power of attorney holder cannot be substituted as the…
- Shoaib Alias Richie Sequeira vs Union Of India And Ors. — Bombay High Court, 9 Jul 2025. Where the Government demonstrates that detailed action has been taken against alleged export-promotion-scheme fraud and systemic safeguards have been implemented, a public interest petition on the subject stands…
- Textech Indo (India) P. Ltd vs The Senior Intelligence Officer — Madras High Court, 8 Oct 2015. Where a prior sale is completed, the Department is prohibited from claiming right over the property, since the first charge created by Section 142A of the Customs Act, 1962 is expressly subject to the SARFAESI Act, 2002.