Case law

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal · 21 Aug 2025

Manasa Impex Services vs Commissioner Of Customs And Central Excise, Coimbatore) With

Legal principle

A customs broker's failure to perform duties under CHALR attracts disciplinary action under CHALR alone; a penalty under section 114 of the Customs Act requires proof of abetment or active collusion — involvement beyond those duties with knowledge of the illegality, common intention or a stake in it.

Court decision

The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the customs broker under sections 114(iii) and 117 and allowed the appeals with consequential relief. On the extract, no final ruling is recorded on the DRI-jurisdiction question under Section 75; the disposal rests on the merits of the penalty.

Facts

DRI investigated alleged fraudulent exports by M/s. SSK Knit Apparels, Tirupur, finding fictitious firms, inflated export values, substandard goods and duty drawback claims of Rs. 1,05,81,796 without realisation of export proceeds. A SCN dated 06.10.2006 was issued by DRI to the customs broker (CHA), Manasa Impex Services, for allegedly filing shipping bills without verifying declarations and otherwise facilitating the wrongful drawback claims. Orders-in-Original 06-14/2009 of the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Coimbatore confirmed recovery of the drawback with interest from the exporter and imposed a penalty of Rs. 5,00,000 on the CHA under section 114(iii) of the Customs Act, with a further penalty under section 117 in one OIO. The CHA appealed to CESTAT, Chennai, in nine appeals decided by a common order.

Key provisions