Case law

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal · 30 Apr 2026

Haji S International vs Commissioner Of Customs-Air Cargo…

Legal principle

Where the repealing 2017 Drawback Rules contain a specific saving provision in rule 20(2), section 159A of the Customs Act does not apply, and recovery of drawback under rule 16 or 16A of the repealed 1995 Rules cannot be initiated after 01.10.2017 in respect of claims filed and sanctioned before that date.

Court decision

Both appeals were allowed and the Commissioner's order dated 15.11.2023 was set aside: recovery of drawback under rule 16 and rule 16A of the 1995 Drawback Rules was held bad in law, the goods could not be confiscated under section 113, penalties under sections 114 and 114AA on the firm and on partner Ashfaq Anwar Nursumar could not be sustained, and the All Industry Rate drawback could not be denied on the basis of the alleged fake invoices or the section 108 statement.

Facts

M/s Haji's International, a partnership firm, exported garments (mainly to Nigeria) under 699 shipping bills between January 2012 and December 2016, claiming duty drawback at the All Industry Rate under section 75 of the Customs Act read with rule 3 of the 1995 Drawback Rules, and received Rs. 773.86 lakhs, plus Rs. 2,24,93,070 disbursed under rule 16A on 198 shipping bills. Based on a DRI statement of Suhel Parvez Ansari alleging supply of fake procurement invoices, the department issued a show cause notice dated 14.12.2022 seeking recovery of the drawback under rule 16 of the 1995 Rules (the Rs. 2,24,93,070 portion for alleged non-realization of foreign exchange), confiscation of goods, and penalties on the firm and its partner Ashfaq Anwar Nursumar under sections 114(i)/(iii) and 114AA. The Commissioner, by order dated 15.11.2023, confirmed the recovery, confiscated the goods with a redemption fine option, and imposed penalties on both appellants.

Key provisions