Customs Act, 1962 › Chapter V — Levy of, and Exemption from, Customs Duties
Section 22. Abatement of duty on damaged or deteriorated goods
Customs Act, 1962
Bare Act
Abatement of duty on damaged or deteriorated goods. —
(1) Where it is shown to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs -
(a) that any imported goods had been damaged or had deteriorated at any time before or during the unloading of the goods in India; or
(b) that any imported goods, other than warehoused goods, had been damaged at any time after the unloading thereof in India but before their examination under section 17, on account of any accident not due to any wilful act, negligence or default of the importer, his employee or agent; or
(c) that any warehoused goods had been damaged at any time before clearance for home consumption on account of any accident not due to any wilful act, negligence or default of the owner, his employee or agent, such goods shall be chargeable to duty in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (2).
(2) The duty to be charged on the goods referred to in sub-section (1) shall bear the same proportion to the duty chargeable on the goods before the damage or deterioration which the value of the damaged or deteriorated goods bears to the value of the goods before the damage or deterioration.
(3) For the purposes of this section, the value of damaged or deteriorated goods may be ascertained by either of the following methods at the option of the owner:
(a) the value of such goods may be ascertained by the proper officer, or
(b) such goods may be sold by the proper officer by public auction or by tender, or with the consent of the owner in any other manner, and the gross sale proceeds shall be deemed to be the value of such goods.
Judgments on Section 22
- M/S Coal India Ltd vs Commr.Of Customs(Port) Kolkata — Supreme Court of India, 1 May 2025. Payments made by an importer to the foreign supplier's Indian agent as a condition of sale, being product support services directly relatable to the importation, must be added to the transaction value under Rule 9(1)(e)…
- Commr.Of Customs (Import) Mumbai vs M/S Ganpati Overseas Thr. Its… — Supreme Court of India, 6 Oct 2023. Undervaluation must be proved by the department through evidence or information of contemporaneous imports of like goods at higher prices, and mere suspicion of the invoice or reliance on foreign export…
- Wipro Ltd vs Asst. Collector Of Customs & Ors — Supreme Court of India, 16 Apr 2015. Loading, unloading and handling charges must be added to the assessable value at their actual ascertainable cost, and the notional 1% of F.O.B.
- J M Baxi And Co vs Commissioner Of Customs-Nhava Sheva — CESTAT, 13 Dec 2024. Salvage equipment consigned to the master of a 'foreign going vessel' under salvage and used in her refloating constitutes 'stores' under section 88 of the Customs Act, 1962, and an agent such as a shipping agent is not…
- New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs M/S. Mudit Roadways — Supreme Court of India, 24 Nov 2023. Sections 22 and 23 of the Customs Act, 1962 (abatement and remission of duty on goods lost or destroyed) enure exclusively to 'importers' of the goods, so a bonded warehouse custodian/licensee remains liable for the…