Case law

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal · 13 Dec 2024

J M Baxi And Co vs Commissioner Of Customs-Nhava Sheva

Legal principle

Salvage equipment consigned to the master of a 'foreign going vessel' under salvage and used in her refloating constitutes 'stores' under section 88 of the Customs Act, 1962, and an agent such as a shipping agent is not the 'person chargeable to duty' who can be proceeded against under section 28.

Court decision

The Tribunal allowed all the appeals and set aside both Orders-in-Original, holding the impugned goods to be 'stores' of a foreign-going vessel under section 88, the section 28 duty demands to have no merit, confiscation under sections 111(n) and 111(o) unsustainable, the penalties under sections 114A and 114AA (and, in the first order, section 112) without authority of law, and holding JM Baxi & Co was not the 'person chargeable to duty'.

Facts

The container vessel MSC Chitra collided with bulk carrier MV Khalijia-II at Jawaharlal Nehru Port on 7 August 2010 and grounded, triggering salvage operations by M/s Smit Salvage BV and Smit Singapore Pte Ltd. Salvage equipment in 27 consignments (via Air Cargo Complex, Mumbai) and 9 consignments (via JNCH, Nhava Sheva) between August 2010 and February 2011 was imported in the name of 'Master of MSC Chitra' c/o JM Baxi & Co and moved under customs escort to the salvage site. The Commissioners confirmed duty demands of ₹2,26,10,697 and ₹2,50,68,363 under section 28 with interest under section 28AA, confiscated goods (valued at ₹9,24,91,810.41 and ₹10,26,09,460) under sections 111(n) and 111(o) with redemption fines under section 125, and imposed penalty under section 114A on JM Baxi & Co plus penalties under sections 112 and 114AA on its employees Vijayan Chrysostom D'Souza and Anshu Sahay.

Key provisions