Customs Act, 1962 › Chapter V — Levy of, and Exemption from, Customs Duties
Section 26A. Refund of import duty in certain cases
Customs Act, 1962
Bare Act
Refund of import duty in certain cases. —
(1) Where on the importation of any goods capable of being easily identified as such imported goods, any duty has been paid on clearance of such goods for home consumption, such duty shall be refunded to the person by whom or on whose behalf it was paid, if -
(a) the goods are found to be defective or otherwise not in conformity with the specifications agreed upon between the importer and the supplier of goods:
Provided that the goods have not been worked, repaired or used after importation except where such use was indispensable to discover the defects or non-conformity with the specifications;
(b) the goods are identified to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs as the goods which were imported;
(c) the importer does not claim drawback under any other provisions of this Act; and
(d) (i) the goods are exported; or
(ii) the importer relinquishes his title to the goods and abandons them to customs; or
(iii) such goods are destroyed or rendered commercially valueless in the presence of the proper officer, in such manner as may be prescribed and within a period not exceeding thirty days from the date on which the proper officer makes an order for the clearance of imported goods for home consumption under section 47:
Provided that the period of thirty days may, on sufficient cause being shown, be extended by the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs for a period not exceeding three months:
Provided further that nothing contained in this section shall apply to the goods regarding which an offence appears to have been committed under this Act or any other law for the time being in force.
(2) An application for refund of duty shall be made before the expiry of six months from the relevant date in such form and in such manner as may be prescribed.
Explanation. — For the purposes of this sub-section, "relevant date" means,-
(a) in cases where the goods are exported out of India, the date on which the proper officer makes an order permitting clearance and loading of goods for exportation under section 51;
(b) in cases where the title to the goods is relinquished, the date of such relinquishment;
(c) in cases where the goods are destroyed or rendered commercially valueless, the date of such destruction or rendering of goods commercially valueless.
(3) No refund under sub-section (1) shall be allowed in respect of perishable goods and goods which have exceeded their shelf life or their recommended storage-before-use period.
(4) The Board may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify any other condition subject to which the refund under sub-section (1) may be allowed.
Judgments on Section 26A
- Nosch Labs Pvt Ltd vs Hyderabad - Customs — CESTAT, 11 Mar 2022. Section 113(d) of the Customs Act applies only where the export of goods is itself prohibited by law and only to export goods not yet out of India; a notification under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act…
- Manyata Promoters Pvt Ltd vs Bangalore Customs — CESTAT, 30 Jul 2026. Where no 'Out of Charge' order under Section 47(1) is passed and the amount paid is never appropriated towards any duty demand, the payment retains the character of a deposit rather than duty and is refundable, since…
- Commissioner Of Customs vs M/S. Hadeed Steels Pvt.Ltd — Kerala High Court, 8 Nov 2024. Where imported goods are never cleared for home consumption but are re-exported in their entirety, the taxable event for the levy of import duty does not materialise and the Customs Department has no justification to…
- Kundan Care Products Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs-New Delhi Acc… — CESTAT, 31 Jul 2024. A penalty imposed under section 112 of the Customs Act for 'contravention' of statutory provisions is not a penalization for an 'offence', since offences and penalties are distinct categories; therefore, a licensee who…
- Commissioner Of Customs, Bangalore vs Sundaram Fasteners Ltd. — CESTAT, 25 Jun 2024. Section 26A of the Customs Act, 1962 applies only to goods imported for home consumption; duty on re-import of exported goods is governed by Notification No.
- Chennai (Port Export) vs Suguna Poultry Farm Ltd — CESTAT, 10 Jan 2024. Where the department does not dispute the claimant's substantive entitlement to drawback under section 74 and the refund was sanctioned after due verification, an appeal on the mere technicality that refund was claimed…
- Elan Electronics India vs Commissioner, Customs-New Delhi — CESTAT, 4 Jan 2023. Where imported goods are re-exported without ever being cleared for home consumption, the amount deposited in the name of customs duty is not 'duty' but an unauthorisedly retained deposit, so the limitation of section…
- Stainox Alloys Pvt Ltd vs Nhava Sheve - Ii — CESTAT, 11 Sep 2020. Re-export of goods does not obliterate an antecedent mis-declaration at import, but confiscation must rest on a provision alleged in the show-cause notice, and Section 111(o) applies only to breach of a post-import…
- M/S. Hadeed Steels Pvt. Limited vs The Commissioner Of Customs — CESTAT, 19 Oct 2017. Section 26A of the Customs Act, 1962 bars refund only where goods have been cleared for home consumption and are later identified and exported as illegally imported goods; duty paid on goods never cleared for home…
- C.C., New Delhi (Icd)(Tkd) vs M/S. Haldiram Manufacturing Co.P.Ltd — CESTAT, 12 Feb 2016. Refund under Section 26A(1) is confined to goods cleared on payment of duty for home consumption, so where imported goods were never cleared for home consumption but were re-exported, the offence proviso does not bar…
- Steel Authority Of India Limited vs Kolkata-Admn Airport — CESTAT, 20 Jul 2026. The burden is on the appellant to prove, with documentary evidence, that a plea was taken before the Commissioner (Appeals); in the absence of such evidence, the Tribunal is not required to consider that plea and may…