Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 › Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009
Regulation 11. Suspension or revocation of approval for appointment of a Customs Cargo Service provider
Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009
Official text
Regulation 11. Suspension or revocation of approval for appointment of a Customs Cargo Service provider:
(1) The Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be may, subject to the provisions of these regulations, suspend or revoke the approval granted to the Customs Cargo Service provider subject to the observance of procedure prescribed under regulation 12 and also order for forfeiture of security, if any, for failure to comply with any of the provisions of the Act and the rules, regulations, notifications and orders made thereunder;
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-regulation (1), the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be may, in appropriate cases where immediate action is necessary, suspend the approval granted to a Customs Cargo Service provider where an enquiry against such Customs Cargo Service provider is pending or contemplated.
Judgments on Regulation 11
- M/S International Cargo Terminal Pvt… vs Commissioner Of Customs-Mumbai -… — CESTAT, 8 Jun 2026. Immediate suspension of a CFS/CCSP approval under Regulation 11 of HCCAR, 2009 is only a temporary measure and cannot be continued beyond a reasonable period (and beyond the 15-day limit indicated in Regulation 7(2))…
- Speedy Multimodes Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Customs Ns-Gen… — CESTAT, 4 Mar 2024. A CFS custodian/CCSP cannot escape liability for pilferage of seized goods in its custody merely because third parties had access; it must indemnify the value of the lost goods under Regulation 5(6) of HCCAR and is…
- Container Corporation Of India Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs-Nhava Sheva — CESTAT, 11 Sep 2023. A custodian/CCSP to whom seized goods are handed over for safe custody under a panchanama cannot escape liability for pilferage caused by negligence by pleading absence of supratnama or non-involvement of its employees,…