Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 › Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009
Regulation 5. Conditions to be fulfilled by Customs Cargo Service provider
Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009
Official text
Regulation 1 5. Conditions to be fulfilled by Customs Cargo Service provider - The Customs Cargo Service provider for custody of imported goods or export goods and for handling of such goods in a customs area shall fulfill the following conditions, namely:-
(1) Provide the following to the satisfaction of the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be, namely:
(i) Infrastructure, equipment and adequate manpower for loading, unloading, stacking, handling, stuffing and de-stuffing of containers, storage, dispatch and delivery of containers and cargo etc., including:-
(a) standard pavement for heavy duty equipment for use in the operational and stacking area;
(b) free of cost or rent fully furnished office accommodation for Customs, Customs Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) Service Centre, with required amenities and facilities and residential accommodation and transportation facilities for customs staff;
(c) premises for user agencies with basic amenities and facilities;
(d) storage facility, separately for imported, export and transshipment goods;
(e) gate complex with separate entry and exit;
(f) adequate parking space for vehicles;
(g) boundary wall;
(h) internal service roads;
(i) electronic weigh-bridge and other weighing and measuring devices;
(j) computerized system for location and accountal of goods, and processing of documents;
(k) adequate air-conditioned space and power back up, hardware, networking and other equipment for secure connectivity with the Customs Automated system; and for exchange of information between Customs Community partners;
(l) facilities for auction, including by e-auction, for disposal of uncleared, unclaimed or abandoned cargo;
(m) facilities for installation of scanning equipment;
(n) security and access control to prohibit unauthorized access into the premises, and 3 (o) such other equipment or facilities as the Board or Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be, may specify having regard to the screening, examination, custody and handling of imported or export goods in a customs area.
(ii) safe, secure and spacious premises for loading, unloading, handling and storing of the cargo for the projected capacity and for the examination and other operations as may be required in compliance with any law for the time being in force;
(iii) insurance for an amount equal to the average value of goods likely to be stored in the customs area based on the projected capacity, and for an amount as the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be may specify having regard to the goods which have already been insured by the importers or exporters.
(2) Undertake to bear the cost of the Customs officers posted, at such customs area, on cost recovery basis, by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner and shall make payments at such rates and in the manner prescribed, unless specifically exempted by an order of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance;
(3) Execute a bond equal to the average amount of duty involved on the imported goods and ten per cent of value of export goods likely to be stored in the customs area during a period of thirty days and furnish a bank guarantee or cash deposit equivalent to ten per cent of such duty:
Provided that the condition of furnishing of bank guarantee or cash deposit shall not be applicable to ports notified under the Major Ports Act, 1962 (38 of 1963) or to the Central government or State Governments or their undertakings or to the Customs Cargo Service provider authorised under Authorised Economic Operator Programme (4) Execute a separate bond for an amount equal to ten percent of value of export goods with a bank guarantee for an amount equal to ten percent of the value of the bond, towards the export goods transported from the customs area to any other customs area for export or transshipment, as the case may be;
Provided that the condition of furnishing of Bank guarantee or cash deposit shall not be applicable to ports notified under the Major Ports Act, 1962 (38 of 1963) or to the Central Government or State Governments or their undertakings or to the Customs Cargo Service provider authorised under Authorised Economic Operator Programme.
(5) Undertake to comply with the provisions and abide by all the provisions of the Act and the rules, regulations, notifications and orders issued thereunder.
(6) Undertake to indemnify the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be from any liability arising on account of damages caused or loss suffered on imported or export goods, due to accident, damage, deterioration, destruction or any other unnatural cause during their receipt, storage, delivery, dispatch or otherwise handling.
Judgments on Regulation 5
- M/S International Cargo Terminal Pvt… vs Commissioner Of Customs-Mumbai -… — CESTAT, 8 Jun 2026. Immediate suspension of a CFS/CCSP approval under Regulation 11 of HCCAR, 2009 is only a temporary measure and cannot be continued beyond a reasonable period (and beyond the 15-day limit indicated in Regulation 7(2))…
- Speedy Multimodes Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Customs Ns-Gen… — CESTAT, 4 Mar 2024. A CFS custodian/CCSP cannot escape liability for pilferage of seized goods in its custody merely because third parties had access; it must indemnify the value of the lost goods under Regulation 5(6) of HCCAR and is…
- Kannur International Airport Ltd vs Cochin-Cus — CESTAT, 23 Sep 2025. Interest under Section 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962 is attracted only where the amount payable is 'duty' under Section 28, and therefore cannot be levied on cost recovery charges, which are not duty.
- Central Warehousing Corporation vs Ahmedabad — CESTAT, 22 Jul 2024. In the absence of a statutory recovery mechanism and rates and manner specified by the Government of India, cost recovery charges cannot be recovered from a CFS/custodian even under Regulations 5(2) and 6(1)(o) of the…
- Diamond And Gem Development vs Ahmedabad — CESTAT, 12 Jun 2024. Cost recovery charges for customs officers posted in a customs area cannot be confirmed or recovered from a Customs Cargo Service provider where HCCAR, 2009 prescribes no recovery mechanism and the Government of India…
- Apm Terminals India P Ltd Main vs The Commissioner Of Customs Ns-Gen… — CESTAT, 17 May 2024. Control of customs areas under HCCAR-2009 confers no authority on customs officers to enforce the Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules, 1989, a public notice has no legal standing under the…
- Central Board Of Excise And Customs vs M/S Gmr Hyderabad International… — Telangana High Court, 27 Mar 2024. Cost recovery charges in the nature of salaries of Customs officers performing statutory duties cannot be levied by regulation absent express statutory authorization, and such administrative charges, being a tax without…
- Container Corporation Of India Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs-Nhava Sheva — CESTAT, 11 Sep 2023. A custodian/CCSP to whom seized goods are handed over for safe custody under a panchanama cannot escape liability for pilferage caused by negligence by pleading absence of supratnama or non-involvement of its employees,…
- M/S.Sun Global Logistics Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India — Madras High Court, 2 Jun 2021. Cost Recovery Charges cannot be levied or collected from a Customs Cargo Service Provider in the absence of a notification/Government order specifying the rates under the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations,…
- M/S. Mumbai International Airport… vs The Union Of India, Through Secretary,… — Bombay High Court, 13 Oct 2014. A custodian appointed under section 45 of the Customs Act who voluntarily accepts custodianship and facility approvals subject to the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 is bound by Regulation 5(2), and…
- M/S.Cfs Association Of India vs Union Of India & Ors — Bombay High Court, 5 Oct 2011. Questions such as prescribing a safe distance between general and hazardous cargo are matters of scientific expertise on which a court under Article 226 defers to the Commissioner of Customs and will not interfere…
- Goodearth Maritime Limited vs Kandla — CESTAT, 12 Mar 2020. Cost recovery charges from a custodian under Regulation 5(2) of the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 are unsustainable in law because customs clearance is a sovereign function, no special service or…