Customs Act, 1962 › Chapter XIV — Confiscation of goods and conveyances and imposition of penalties
Section 115. Confiscation of conveyances
Customs Act, 1962
Bare Act
Confiscation of conveyances. —
(1) The following conveyances shall be liable to confiscation:-
(a) any vessel which is or has been within the Indian customs waters, any aircraft which is or has been in India, or any vehicle which is or has been in a customs area, while constructed, adapted, altered or fitted in any manner for the purpose of concealing goods;
(b) any conveyance from which the whole or any part of the goods is thrown overboard, staved or destroyed so as to prevent seizure by an officer of customs;
(c) any conveyance which having been required to stop or land under section 106 fails to do so, except for good and sufficient cause;
(d) any conveyance from which any warehoused goods cleared for exportation, or any other goods cleared for exportation under a claim for drawback, are unloaded, without the permission of the proper officer;
(e) any conveyance carrying imported goods which has entered India and is afterwards found with the whole or substantial portion of such goods missing, unless the master of the vessel or aircraft is able to account for the loss of, or deficiency in, the goods.
(2) Any conveyance or animal used as a means of transport in the smuggling of any goods or in the carriage of any smuggled goods shall be liable to confiscation, unless the owner of the conveyance or animal proves that it was so used without the knowledge or connivance of the owner himself, his agent, if any, and the person in charge of the conveyance or animal [Omitted]:
Provided that where any such conveyance is used for the carriage of goods or passengers for hire, the owner of any conveyance shall be given an option to pay in lieu of the confiscation of the conveyance a fine not exceeding the market price of the goods which are sought to be smuggled or the smuggled goods, as the case may be.
Explanation. — In this section,"market price" means market price at the date when the goods are seized.
Judgments on Section 115
- M/S.N.C.Alexender vs The Commissioner Of Customs — Madras High Court, 9 Jun 2022. Show cause notices and adjudication orders issued by DRI officers are valid because they are appointed as 'Officers of Customs' under Section 4 of the Customs Act, 1962, and Section 97 of the Finance Act, 2022…
- Commissioner Of Customs (Preventive) vs I T C Global Holdings Pvt Ltd — Gujarat High Court, 5 Aug 2026. Burnt cars reduced to scrap are neither restricted 'commercial and passenger automobile vehicles' under the Negative List nor 'second hand goods', so their import is not liable to confiscation under Section 111(d), and…
- Shri.K.Ananthapadmanabha Rao vs The Commissioner Of Central Taxes — Karnataka High Court, 27 Apr 2026. An order of dismissal passed without granting a specifically requested personal hearing—despite pending parallel criminal discharge and customs appellate proceedings—violates the principles of natural justice, and such…