Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995 › Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995.
Rule 7. Cases where amount or rate of drawback determined is low
Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995
Official text
Rule 7. Cases where amount or rate of drawback determined is low. —
(1) Where, in respect of any goods, the manufacturer or exporter finds that the amount or rate of drawback determined under rule 3 or, as the case may be, revised under rule 4, for the class of goods is less than four-fifth of the duties or taxes paid on the materials or components or input services used in the production or manufacture of the said goods, he may, except where the a claim for drawback under Rule 3 or Rule 4 has been made, within three months from the date relevant for the applicability of the amount or rate of drawback in terms of sub-rule (3) of rule 5, make an application in writing to the Principal Commissioner of Central Excise or Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be or the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise having jurisdiction over the manufacturing unit, of the manufacturer or, of the supporting manufacturer, as the case may be, for determination of the amount or rate of drawback thereof stating all relevant facts including the proportion in which the materials or components or input services are used in the production or manufacture of goods and the duties or taxes paid on such materials or components or input services:
Provided that-
(i) the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Assistant Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, as the case may be, may extend the aforesaid period of three months by the period of three months and that the Principal Commissioner of Central Excise or Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, as the case may be, may further extend the period of six months;
(ii) the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Assistant Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise or Principal Commissioner of Central Excise or Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, as the case may be, may, on an application and after making such enquiry as he thinks fit, grant extension or refuse to grant extension after recording in writing the reasons for such refusal;
(iii) an application fee equivalent to 1% of the FOB value of exports or Rs. 1000/- whichever is less, shall be payable for applying for grant of extension by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Assistant Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, as the case may be, and an application fee of 2% of the FOB value or Rs. 2000/- whichever is less, shall be payable for applying for grant of extension by the Principal Commissioner of Central Excise or Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, as the case may be.
(2) On receipt of the application referred to in sub-rule (1), the Principal Commissioner of Central Excise or Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be or the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner Customs and Central Excise, as the case may be, may, after making or causing to be made such inquiry as it deems fit, allow payment of drawback to such exporter at such amount or at such rate as may be determined to be appropriate, if the amount or rate of drawback determined under rule 3 or, as the case may be, revised under rule 4, is in fact less than four-fifth of such amount or rate determined under this sub-rule.
(3) Provisional drawback amount, as may be specified by the Central Government, shall be paid the proper officer of Customs and where manufacturer or exporter desires that he may be granted further drawback provisionally, he may, while making an application under sub-rule (1), apply to the Principal Commissioner of Central Excise or Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, or the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, as the case may be, in writing in this behalf in the manner as has been provided in clause (a) of sub-rule (2) of rule 6 for the applications made under that rule along with details of provisional drawback already paid and grant of further provisional drawback shall be considered in the manner and subject to the conditions specified in clauses (b) and (c) of sub-rule (2), and sub-rule (3) of rule 6, subject to the condition that bond required to be executed by the claimant shall only be for the difference between amount or rate of drawback determined under rule 3 or, as the case may be, revised under rule 4 by the Central Government and the provisional drawback authorised by the Principal Commissioner of Central Excise of Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be or the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, as the case may be, under this rule.
(4) Where the Central Government considers it necessary so to do, it may-
(a) revoke the rate of drawback or amount of drawback, determined under sub-rule (2) by the Principal Commissioner of Central Excise or Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, or the Principal Commissioner of Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, as the case may be, or
(b) direct the Principal Commissioner of Central Excise or Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be or the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, as the case may be, to withdraw the rate of drawback or amount of drawback determined.
(5)[Omitted]
Judgments on Rule 7
- Hemant Bohra vs Commissioner Of Customs-Nhava Sheva -… — CESTAT, 26 Aug 2024. Drawback provisions being an incentive-oriented scheme for augmenting exports, procedural requirements such as Rule 13(1)(a) documentation and Section 149 shipping bill amendment must receive a liberal construction and…