Customs (Appeals) Rules, 1982 › Chapter II — APPEALS TO [COMMISSIONER] (APPEALS)

Rule 5. Production of additional evidence before the [Commissioner] (Appeals)

Customs (Appeals) Rules, 1982

Official text

Rule 5. Production of additional evidence before the Commissioner (Appeals). —

(1) The appellant shall not be entitled to produce before the Commissioner (Appeals) any evidence, whether oral or documentary, other than the evidence produced by him during the course of proceedings before the adjudicating authority, except in the following circumstances, namely:-

(a) where the adjudicating authority has refused to admit evidence which ought to have been admitted; or

(b) where the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from producing the evidence which he was called upon to produce by that authority; or

(c) where the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from producing before the authority any evidence which is relevant to any ground of appeal; or

(d) where the adjudicating authority has made the order appealed against without giving sufficient opportunity to the appellant to adduce evidence relevant to any ground of appeal.

(2) No evidence shall be admitted under sub-rule (1) unless the Commissioner (Appeals) records in writing the reasons for its admission.

(3) The Commissioner (Appeals) shall not take any evidence produced under sub-rule (1) unless the adjudicating authority or an officer authorised in this behalf by the said authority has been allowed a reasonable opportunity -

(a) to examine the evidence or documents or to cross-examine any witness produced by the appellant; or

(b) to produce any evidence or any witness in rebuttal of the evidence produced by the appellant under sub-rule (1).

(4) Nothing contained in this rule shall affect the powers of the Commissioner (Appeals) to direct the production of any document, or the examination of any witness, to enable him to dispose of the appeal.

Judgments on Rule 5

  • Wipro Ge Healthcare Pvt Ltd vs Mumbai-Air Cargo Import — CESTAT, 19 Feb 2026. A judgment or order of a Court/Tribunal is not 'additional evidence' or 'documentary evidence' under Rule 5 of the Customs (Appeals) Rules, 1982 or Section 149 of the Customs Act, and an appellate authority, empowered…
  • Rungta Mines Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs — CESTAT, 3 Sep 2026. There can be no estoppel against the statute — mere acceptance of an assessment cannot validate it where it is contrary to the statutory tariff, binding precedents and the Board's Circular, and a legal question as to…
  • Rungta Mines Ltd vs Visakhapatnam-Cus — CESTAT, 3 Sep 2026. A legal ground based on facts already on record is not 'additional evidence' under Rule 5 of the Customs (Appeals) Rules, 1982, there can be no estoppel against the correct application of a statutory provision, and the…