Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 › Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018
Regulation 17. Procedure for revoking license or imposing penalty
Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018
Official text
Regulation 17. Procedure for revoking license or imposing penalty: -
(1) The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Customs shall issue a notice in writing to the Customs Broker within a period of ninety days from the date of receipt of an offence report, stating the grounds on which it is proposed to revoke the license or impose penalty requiring the said Customs Broker to submit within thirty days to the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs nominated by him, a written statement of defense and also to specify in the said statement whether the Customs Broker desires to be heard in person by the said Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs.
(2) The Commissioner of Customs may, on receipt of the written statement from the Customs Broker, or where no such statement has been received within the time-limit specified in the notice referred to in sub-regulation (1), direct the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be, to inquire into the grounds which are not admitted by the Customs Broker.
(3) The Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs, as the case maybe, shall, in the course of inquiry, consider such documentary evidence and take such oral evidence as may be relevant or material to the inquiry in regard to the grounds forming the basis of the proceedings, and he may also put any question to any person tendering evidence for or against the Customs Broker, for the purpose of ascertaining the correct position.
(4) The Customs Broker shall be entitled to cross-examine the persons examined in support of the grounds forming the basis of the proceedings, and where the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs declines permission to examine any person on the grounds that his evidence is not relevant or material, he shall record his reasons in writing for so doing.
(5) At the conclusion of the inquiry, the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be, shall prepare a report of the inquiry and after recording his findings thereon submit the report within a period of ninety days from the date of issue of a notice under sub-regulation (1).
(6) The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Customs shall furnish to the Customs Broker a copy of the report of the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be, and shall require the Customs Broker to submit, within the specified period not being less than thirty days, any representation that he may wish to make against the said report.
(7) The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Customs shall, after considering the report of the inquiry and the representation thereon, if any, made by the Customs Broker, pass such orders as he deems fit either revoking the suspension of the license or revoking the license of the Customs Broker within ninety days from the date of submission of the report by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs, under sub-regulation (5):
Provided that no order for revoking the license shall be passed unless an opportunity is given to the Customs Broker to be heard in person by the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs, as the case maybe.
(8) Where in the proceedings under these regulations, the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be, comes to a conclusion that the F card holder is guilty of grounds specified in regulation 14 or incapacitated in the meaning of the said regulation, then the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs may pass an order imposing penalty as provided in regulation 18:
Provided that where an order is passed against an F card holder, he shall surrender the photo identity card issued in Form F forthwith to the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs.
(9) Where in an offence report, charges have been framed against an F card holder in addition to the Customs Broker who has been issued a license under regulation 7, then procedure prescribed in regulations 16 and 17shall be followed mutatis mutandis in so far as the prescribed procedure is relevant to the F card holder:
Provided that where any action is contemplated against a G card holder alone under these regulations, then instead of authority referred to in sub-regulation (8), a Deputy Commissioner or Assistant Commissioner rank officer shall pass such order as mentioned in the said sub-regulation along with debarring such G card holder from transacting the business under these regulations for a period of six months from such order.
Provided further that where an order is passed against a G card holder, then he shall surrender the photo identity card issued in Form G forthwith to the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs.
Explanation. — Offence report for the purposes of this regulation means a summary of investigation and prima facie framing of charges into the allegation of acts of commission or omission of the Customs Broker or a F card holder or a G card holder, as the case may be, under these regulations thereunder which would render him unfit to transact business under these regulations.
Judgments on Regulation 17
- M/S. V Unit vs The Commissioner Of Customs( General) — Madras High Court, 22 Sep 2026. The 90 day limit in Regulation 17(1) of CBLR 2018 is mandatory, and where there is no separate offence report it runs from receipt of the show cause notice (with relied upon documents) or the order in original; asking…
- M/S Vogue Logistics Pvt Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Customs Airport And General — Delhi High Court, 31 Aug 2026. Where oral evidence is sought to be relied upon in an inquiry under Regulation 17 of the CBLR, the Customs Broker must be afforded the corresponding right of cross-examination under Regulation 17(4), but a procedural…
- M/S Anax Air Services Pvt. Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs New Delhi — Delhi High Court, 10 Apr 2026. A Customs Broker's contravention of the obligations under the CBLR attracts disciplinary sanction—revocation, forfeiture of security and penalty—even without proof of criminal intention, since the agent cannot plead…
- Atr Logistics India Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs Airport &… — CESTAT, 18 Nov 2025. A Customs Broker fulfils Regulation 10(n) by verifying the client's IEC, GSTIN, identity and declared address through reliable, independent, authentic documents such as government-issued GSTIN and IEC; physical…
- Planet World Cargo vs Commissioner, Customs (Airport &… — CESTAT, 31 Oct 2025. A Customs Broker cannot file Shipping Bills or Bills of Entry in the name of an exporter or importer without that person's explicit authorisation — acting at the behest of a third party renders the documents benami and…
- International Cargo Services vs Ahmedabad — CESTAT, 11 Apr 2022. Revocation of a Customs Broker's licence must be commensurate with the gravity of the offence and, being an extreme and harsh punishment, should be imposed only in the rarest of rare cases of serious irregularity or…
- M/S.Jai Logistics Services Pvt. Ltd vs The Principal Commissioner Of Customs — Madras High Court, 12 Jun 2020. Failure of the Inquiry Officer to communicate the inquiry report within the 90-day period stipulated in Regulation 17(5) of the CBLR, 2018 — even after reckoning the COVID-19 extension under Notification G.S.R.601(E)…
- The Couriers Association Of India vs The Union Of India And Ors — Bombay High Court, 22 Dec 2014. A writ court will not interfere under Article 226 with a pure policy decision prescribing a qualifying examination for persons handling customs clearance, where the affected employees remain eligible to take that…