Customs (Administration of Rules of Origin under Trade Agreements) Rules, 2020 › Customs (Administration of Rules of Origin under Trade Agreements) Rules, 2020

Rule 3. Preferential tariff claim

Customs (Administration of Rules of Origin under Trade Agreements) Rules, 2020

Official text

Rule 3. Preferential tariff claim. —

(1) To claim preferential rate of duty under a trade agreement, the importer or his agent shall, at the time of filing bill of entry,-

(a) make declaration in the bill of entry that the goods qualify as originating goods for preferential rate of duty under that agreement;

(b) indicate in the bill of entry the respective tariff notification against each item on which preferential rate of duty is claimed;

(c) produce certificate of origin covering each item on which preferential rate of duty is claimed; and

(d) enter details of certificate of origin in the bill of entry, namely:

(i) certificate of origin reference number;

(ii) date of issuance of certificate of origin;

(iii) originating criteria;

(iv) indicate if accumulation/cumulation is applied;

(v) indicate if the certificate of origin is issued by a third country (back-to-back); and

(vi) indicate if goods have been transported directly from country of origin.

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules, the claim of preferential rate of duty may be denied by the proper officer without verification if the certificate of origin-

(a) is incomplete and not in accordance with the format as prescribed by the Rules of Origin;

(b) has any alteration not authenticated by the Issuing Authority;

(c) is produced after its validity period has expired; or

(d) is issued for an item which is not eligible for preferential tariff treatment under the trade agreement; and in all such cases, the certificate shall be marked as "INAPPLICABLE".

Explanation: Clause (d) of sub-rule (2) includes the cases where goods are not covered in the respective tariff notification or the product specific rule mentioned in the certificate of origin is not applicable to the goods.

Judgments on Rule 3

  • Rajasthan Metals vs Union Of India & Ors — Delhi High Court, 28 Apr 2026. Unincorporated treaty provisions cannot override national law, and Customs authorities retain full jurisdiction under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 to issue show cause notices alleging fraud, misrepresentation or…
  • Covestro India Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner Of Custome… — Bombay High Court, 16 Apr 2026. A Commissioner of Customs cannot, by public notice, dilute the benefits of free trade agreements or obliterate the law or CBIC circulars; instructions on such trade-agreement matters flow solely from the CBIC under…
  • M/S M.D. Overseas Private Limited vs Union Of India & Ors. — Delhi High Court, 13 Sep 2024. A proper officer cannot mechanically impose a 100% PD Bond or Bank Guarantee pending certificate-of-origin verification; absent recorded grounds under Section 18(1) and compliance with the Section 28DA/CAROTAR…
  • Shri Santosh Kumar Senapati vs Kolkata-Prev — CESTAT, 27 Apr 2026. Where Certificates of Origin issued by the exporting country's authorities have been verified and certified correct, the DRI has no authority to question them, and in the absence of even an iota of evidence of…