Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 › Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009
Regulation 10. Approval of appointment of a Customs Cargo Service provider and review thereof
Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009
Official text
Regulation 10. Approval of appointment of a Customs Cargo Service provider and review thereof:
(1) Where the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be is satisfied that the applicant has fulfilled the conditions prescribed in regulation 5, he may approve such an applicant as a Customs Cargo Service provider, for a period of two years from the date of issue of such approval.
Provided that a Customs Cargo Service provider already approved on or before the date of coming into force of these regulations, shall be deemed to be approved as a Customs Cargo Service provider under these regulations for a period of five years from the date of compliance with the conditions of these regulations as stipulated in regulation 4.
(2)The Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be shall review the approval granted under sub regulation (1) before the expiry of the initial period of approval of two years or five years, as the case may be, and may extend such approval to a further period of five years at a time.
Provided that the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be, for reasons to be recorded in writing, may order for review of the approval granted to any Customs Cargo Service provider before the completion of the period of approval.
Provided further that in case of Customs Cargo Service provider authorised under Authorised Economic Operator Programme', the approval granted under sub-regulation (1) may be extended for a further period of ten years at a time.
Judgments on Regulation 10
- M/S International Cargo Terminal Pvt… vs Commissioner Of Customs-Mumbai -… — CESTAT, 8 Jun 2026. Immediate suspension of a CFS/CCSP approval under Regulation 11 of HCCAR, 2009 is only a temporary measure and cannot be continued beyond a reasonable period (and beyond the 15-day limit indicated in Regulation 7(2))…
- Speedy Multimodes Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Customs Ns-Gen… — CESTAT, 4 Mar 2024. A CFS custodian/CCSP cannot escape liability for pilferage of seized goods in its custody merely because third parties had access; it must indemnify the value of the lost goods under Regulation 5(6) of HCCAR and is…
- Apm Terminals India P Ltd Main vs The Commissioner Of Customs Ns-Gen… — CESTAT, 17 May 2024. Control of customs areas under HCCAR-2009 confers no authority on customs officers to enforce the Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules, 1989, a public notice has no legal standing under the…
- Container Corporation Of India Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs-Nhava Sheva — CESTAT, 11 Sep 2023. A custodian/CCSP to whom seized goods are handed over for safe custody under a panchanama cannot escape liability for pilferage caused by negligence by pleading absence of supratnama or non-involvement of its employees,…