Customs (Administration of Rules of Origin under Trade Agreements) Rules, 2020 › Customs (Administration of Rules of Origin under Trade Agreements) Rules, 2020

Rule 5. Requisition of information from the importer

Customs (Administration of Rules of Origin under Trade Agreements) Rules, 2020

Official text

Rule 5. Requisition of information from the importer. —

(1) Where, during the course of customs clearance or thereafter, the proper officer has reason to believe that origin criteria prescribed in the respective Rules of Origin have not been met, he may seek information and supporting documents, as may be deemed necessary, from the importer in terms of rule 4 to ascertain correctness of the claim.

(2) Where the importer is asked to furnish information or documents, he shall provide the same to the proper officer within ten working days from the date of such information or documents being sought.

(3) Where, on the basis of information and documents received, the proper officer is satisfied that the origin criteria prescribed in the respective Rules of Origin have been met, he shall accept the claim and inform the importer in writing within fifteen working days from the date of receipt of said information and documents.

(4) Where the importer fails to provide requisite information and documents by the prescribed due date or where the information and documents received from the importer are found to be insufficient to conclude that the origin criteria prescribed in the respective Rules of Origin have been met, the proper officer shall forward a verification proposal in terms of rule 6 to the nodal officer nominated for this purpose.

(5) Not with standing anything contained in this rule, the Principal Commissioner of Customs or the Commissioner of Customs may, for the reasons to be recorded in writing, disallow the claim of preferential rate of duty without further verification, where:

(a) T he importer relinquishes the claim; or

(b) T he information and documents furnished by the importer and available on record provide sufficient evidence to prove that goods do not meet the origin criteria prescribed in the respective Rules of Origin.

Judgments on Rule 5

  • Rajasthan Metals vs Union Of India & Ors — Delhi High Court, 28 Apr 2026. Unincorporated treaty provisions cannot override national law, and Customs authorities retain full jurisdiction under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 to issue show cause notices alleging fraud, misrepresentation or…
  • Covestro India Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner Of Custome… — Bombay High Court, 16 Apr 2026. A Commissioner of Customs cannot, by public notice, dilute the benefits of free trade agreements or obliterate the law or CBIC circulars; instructions on such trade-agreement matters flow solely from the CBIC under…
  • M/S M.D. Overseas Private Limited vs Union Of India & Ors. — Delhi High Court, 13 Sep 2024. A proper officer cannot mechanically impose a 100% PD Bond or Bank Guarantee pending certificate-of-origin verification; absent recorded grounds under Section 18(1) and compliance with the Section 28DA/CAROTAR…
  • Shri Santosh Kumar Senapati vs Kolkata-Prev — CESTAT, 27 Apr 2026. Where Certificates of Origin issued by the exporting country's authorities have been verified and certified correct, the DRI has no authority to question them, and in the absence of even an iota of evidence of…