Customs Act, 1962 › Chapter XIVA — Settlement of Cases
Section 127C. Procedure on receipt of an application under Section 127B
Customs Act, 1962
Bare Act
Procedure on receipt of an application under Section 127B. —
(1) On receipt of an application under section 127B, the Settlement Commission shall, within seven days from the date of receipt of the application, issue a notice to the applicant to explain in writing as to why the application made by him should be allowed to be proceeded with and after taking into consideration the explanation provided by the applicant, the Settlement Commission, shall, within a period of fourteen days from the date of the notice, by an order, allow the application to be proceeded with or reject the application, as the case may be, and the proceedings before the Settlement Commission shall abate on the date of rejection:
Provided that where no notice has been issued or no order has been passed within the aforesaid period by the Settlement Commission, the application shall be deemed to have been allowed to be proceeded with.
(2) A copy of every order under sub-section (1) shall be sent to the applicant and to the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs having jurisdiction.
(3) Where an application is allowed or deemed to have been allowed to be proceeded with under sub-section (1), the Settlement Commission shall, within seven days from the date of order under sub-section (1), call for a report along with the relevant records from the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs having jurisdiction and the Commissioner shall furnish the report within a period of thirty days of the receipt of communication from the Settlement Commission:
Provided that where the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Customs does not furnish the report within the aforesaid period of thirty days, the Settlement Commission shall proceed further in the matter without the report of the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Customs.
(4) Where a report of the Commissioner called for under sub-section (3) has been furnished within the period specified in that sub-section, the Settlement Commission may, after examination of such report, if it is of the opinion that any further enquiry or investigation in the matter is necessary, direct, for reasons to be recorded in writing, the Commissioner (Investigation) within fifteen days of the receipt of the report, to make or cause to be made such further enquiry or investigation and furnish a report within a period of ninety days of the receipt of the communication from the Settlement Commission, on the matters covered by the application and any other matter relating to the case:
Provided that where the Commissioner (Investigation) does not furnish the report within the aforesaid period, the Settlement Commission shall proceed to pass an order under sub-section (5) without such report.
(5) After examination of the records and the report of the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs received under sub-section (3), and the report, if any, of the Commissioner (Investigation) of the Settlement Commission under sub-section (4), and after giving an opportunity to the applicant and to the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs having jurisdiction to be heard, either in person or through a representative duly authorised in this behalf, and after examining such further evidence as may be placed before it or obtained by it, the Settlement Commission may, in accordance with the provisions of this Act, pass such order as it thinks fit on the matters covered by the application and any other matter relating to the case not covered by the application, but referred to in the report of the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs and Commissioner (Investigation) under sub-section (3) or sub-section (4).
(5A) The Settlement Commission may, at any time within three months from the date of passing of the order under sub-section (5), amend such order to rectify any error apparent on the face of record, either suo moto or when such error is brought to its notice by the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs or the applicant:
Provided that no amendment which has the effect of enhancing the liability of the applicant shall be made under this sub-section, unless the Settlement Commission has given notice of such intention to the applicant and the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs as the case may be and has given them a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
(6)[Omitted]
(7) Subject to the provisions of section 32A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), the materials brought on record before the Settlement Commission shall be considered by the Members of the concerned Bench before passing any order under sub-section (5) and, in relation to the passing of such order, the provisions of section 32D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) shall apply.
(8) The order passed under sub-section (5) shall provide for the terms of settlement including any demand by way of duty, penalty or interest, the manner in which any sums due under the settlement shall be paid and all other matters to make the settlement effective and in case of rejection contain the reasons therefore and it shall also provide that the settlement shall be void if it is subsequently found by the Settlement Commission that it has been obtained by fraud or misrepresentation of facts:
Provided that the amount of settlement ordered by the Settlement Commission, shall not be less than the duty liability admitted by the applicant under section 127B.
(8A) The order under sub-section (5) shall be passed within a period of nine months from the last day of the month in which the application under section 127B is made, and if, no order is passed within the said period, the settlement proceedings shall abate, and the adjudicating authority before whom the proceeding at the time of making the application was pending shall dispose of the application in accordance with the provisions of this Act as if no application under the said section had been made:
Provided that the period specified under this sub-section may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, be extended by the Settlement Commission for a further period not exceeding three months:
Provided further that in respect of any application pending under sub-section (5) as on the date on which the Finance Bill, 2023 receives the assent of the President, the said period of nine months shall be reckoned from the date on which the said Finance Bill receives the assent of the President.
(9) Where any duty, interest, fine and penalty payable in pursuance of an order under sub-section (5) is not paid by the applicant within thirty days of receipt of a copy of the order by him, the amount which remains unpaid, shall be recovered along with interest due thereon, as the sums due to the Central Government by the proper officer having jurisdiction over the applicant in accordance with the provisions of section 142.
(10) Where a settlement becomes void as provided under sub-section (8), the proceedings with respect to the matters covered by the settlement shall be deemed to have been revived from the stage at which the application was allowed to be proceeded with by the Settlement Commission and the proper officer having jurisdiction may, notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act, complete such proceedings at any time before the expiry of two years from the date of the receipt of communication that the settlement became void.
(11) On and from the 1st day of April, 2025,––
(a) the provisions of sub-sections (2), (3), (4),
(5), (5A), (7), (8) and (8A) shall apply to pending applications with the modification that for the words “Settlement Commission”, wherever they occur, the words “Interim Board” shall be substituted;
(b) in sub-section (3), for the words “seven days from the date of order”, the words “seven days from the date of receipt of the order” shall be substituted;
(c) in sub-section (7), for the word “Bench”, the words “Interim Board” shall be substituted;
(d) the provisions of sub-section (10) shall have effect as if for the words “Settlement Commission”, the words “Settlement Commission or the Interim Board” had been substituted.
(12) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, the Interim Board may, within three months from the date of its constitution under section 31A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for the reasons to be recorded in writing, extend the time limit referred to in sub-section (8A), by such further period not exceeding twelve months from the date of such constitution.
Judgments on Section 127C
- Messrs. Siddhi Vinayak Enterprises And… vs The Union Of India Through The Secretary… — Bombay High Court, 4 Apr 2017. Once the 14-day period under section 127C(1) expires without an admissibility order, a settlement application is deemed allowed to be proceeded with, and the Settlement Commission cannot thereafter reject it as…
- Imran Humayun Chandiwala vs State Of Maharashtra Motor Vehicles… — Bombay High Court, 2 Dec 2025. Where an innocent purchaser of a fraudulently imported vehicle pays the customs duty, interest and redemption fine settled by the Settlement Commission and holds Section 127H immunity, the vehicle's registration cannot…
- Kbs Industries Ltd & Anr. vs The Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Settlement Commission Principal Bench New Delhi — Delhi High Court, 13 Jan 2025. An exemption notification issued under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 can validly impose, as a condition of exemption, liability to pay the duty leviable together with interest at 15% per annum from the date of…
- Acer India Pvt Limited vs Cc Sea Ch - Ii — CESTAT, 25 Sep 2023. Where the importer is eligible to avail credit of the duties paid so that the case is revenue-neutral, interest, confiscation, redemption fine and penalty cannot be sustained even though the confirmation of duty itself…
- M/S Seville Products Limited vs Commissioner Of Customs (Icd-Tkd)… — Delhi High Court, 18 May 2023. A settlement before the Customs Settlement Commission under Section 127B operates only for the declarant and confers no automatic immunity from penalty on co-noticees, whose liabilities are separate and severable under…
- Honeycom Synergies vs Commissioner Of Customs (Export) & Ors. — Delhi High Court, 19 Nov 2019. Co-operation with the Settlement Commission does not, ipso facto, insulate an applicant from penalty, though non-cooperation does disentitle an applicant thereto — immunity under Section 127H(1) is discretionary and may…
- Commissioner Of Central Excise And Customs, Cochin Who Is The Third vs M/S.asianet Satellite Communications Limited — Madras High Court, 23 Feb 2011. A Settlement Commission's order passed on a full and true disclosure can be set aside only if it is contrary to the provisions of the Act and that contravention has prejudiced the party, since judicial review examines…
- Sony India Pvt. Ltd vs The Union Of India , Through The… — Bombay High Court, 12 Jan 2018. Once a Settlement Commission's final order settles a case, everything payable, including duty and interest, is subsumed in that order, and the Revenue cannot thereafter demand fresh interest on differential duty without…