Case law

Supreme Court of India · 4 Aug 2015

M/S.Jaswal Neco Ltd vs Commnr. Of Customs, Visakhapatnam

Legal principle

Anti-dumping duty is a distinct levy, imposed and collected in a manner different from customs duty, and therefore does not enter the value for computing additional duty under Section 3(2) or special additional duty under Section 3A(2) of the Customs Tariff Act; and no penalty is imposable where duty-free imports against advance licences are used captively without diversion to the domestic tariff area.

Court decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's appeal and set aside CESTAT's judgment. It held that anti-dumping duty, being a separate levy imposed and collected in a completely different manner from customs duty, is not to be included in computing CVD under Section 3(2) or SAD under Section 3A(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, and it set aside the penalty of Rs 20 lakhs as the goods were used captively without diversion to the domestic tariff area.

Facts

M/s Jaswal Neco Ltd, a pig iron manufacturer, imported Low Ash Metallurgical (LAM) Coke under seven bills of entry against four advance licences during June–August 1998 without payment of BCD, SCD, SAD and anti-dumping duty under exemption notifications (30/97, 12/97, 34/98 and 41/97-Cus), furnishing a bond to pay duty if the export obligation was not fulfilled. It admittedly failed to fulfil its export obligation and used the entire imported coke captively in its factory. A demand of Rs 7.21 crores (BCD, ADD, SCD, SAD and cess) was raised; the Commissioner confirmed Rs 3.37 crores with 24% interest and a penalty of Rs 20 lakhs. On appeal, CESTAT reduced interest to 15% but increased the anti-dumping duty by applying the higher rates of final Notification No. 69 of 2000.

Key provisions