Case law

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal · 10 Jul 2026

Sameer Industries vs Kandla

Legal principle

There is no bar on the simultaneous imposition of penalty on a partnership firm and its partner under the Customs Act, 1962, provided the partner's active knowledge and involvement in the acts leading to contravention and duty evasion is established on the facts of the case.

Court decision

The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals, upholding the confiscation of the copper/brass scrap, the customs duty demand with interest under the proviso to section 28, the penalty on the firm under section 114A, and the penalties on partner Shri Ramesh Jain, holding there was no bar to simultaneous imposition of penalty on the firm and its partner.

Facts

M/s Sameer Industries, a unit in Kandla Special Economic Zone engaged in import and recycling of metal scrap, cleared copper/brass scrap to DTA units without payment of duty against advance licences/advance release orders. DRI investigations revealed the buyers (M/s Lord Empire International, M/s Laxmi Enterprises and M/s MIEC Moradabad) were fictitious or never received the goods, their advance licences were cancelled or suspended, payments were made in cash routed through bank accounts, and transporters could not confirm delivery. The Commissioner of Customs, by Order-in-Original dated 11/11/2011, ordered confiscation of the scrap, confirmed customs duty of Rs.70,76,139 under the proviso to section 28 with interest, imposed penalty of Rs.70,76,139 on the firm under section 114A and Rs.15 lakh on partner Shri Ramesh Jain under section 112(a) (besides excise duty demands and penalties). The firm and its partner appealed to the Tribunal.

Key provisions