Case law

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal · 14 Feb 2024

Yash Pakka Limited vs Lucknow Prev

Legal principle

Under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962, a shipping bill may be amended or converted even after export if supported by documentary evidence in existence at the time of export, and a circular's self-imposed time limit or the absence of physical examination cannot defeat this statutory power.

Court decision

The Tribunal held the impugned order unsustainable, ruled that this was 'a fit case in which conversion under Section 149 should have been permitted', and allowed the appeal in favour of the exporter (Final Order No.70136/2024 dated 14.02.2024).

Facts

M/s Yash Pakka Ltd., a manufacturer-exporter of paper and paper products (Chapter 48), filed free shipping bills for exports made between 01.07.2017 and 01.08.2018 (the GST transition period), claiming confusion, while claiming and receiving duty drawback on identical exports both before and after this period. In December 2019 it requested conversion of these free shipping bills into drawback shipping bills under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Lucknow rejected the request, initially without a hearing; on CESTAT remand he again rejected it in Order-in-Original No.01/Tech/2023 dated 13.12.2023, also holding that All Industry Rate drawback could not be allowed without conversion in terms of Para 4 of Circular No.36/2010-Cus, and relied on Rule 13(1)(a) of the Drawback Rules, 2017. The exporter appealed to CESTAT, Allahabad.

Key provisions