Case law
Judgments from CESTAT, the High Courts and the Supreme Court, each summarised and linked to the provisions it applies.
Judgments powered by Indian Kanoon.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal · 21 Aug 2026
Commissioner Of Customs-Nhava Sheva - I vs Godrej Industries Ltd
Legal principle
Both twin conditions of Chapter Note 3 to Chapter 34 — water solubility without separation of insoluble matter and reduction of surface tension to 4.5 x 10-2 N/m — must be cumulatively satisfied for classification as an organic surface-active agent under heading 34.02, and water-insoluble surface-active products fall under heading 3824.
Court decision
The Tribunal held the impugned goods are appropriately classifiable under CTI 3824 9090/3824 9990 and not under CTI 3402 1300; it sustained the Principal Commissioner's order, held the duty demand unsustainable on merits so that interest and penalties do not survive, dismissed the Revenue's appeal, and disposed of the importer's cross objection.
Facts
Godrej Industries Ltd. imported fatty alcohol ethoxylates — 'Dehydol LS1 TH' and 'Dehydol LS2 TH' from M/s Thai Exthoxylate Co. Ltd. and 'Lauryl Alcohol Ethoxylate 2 Mole' from M/s Shell Eastern Chemicals — through 62 bills of entry at Nhava Sheva, self-classifying them under CTI 3824 9090/3824 9990 with a 0% BCD claim under Notification No. 46/2011-Customs. DRI, Ahmedabad developed intelligence of mis-classification, contending the correct classification was CTI 3402 1300 attracting 5% BCD; it searched premises, recorded statements, drew samples, and obtained CRCL Vadodara test reports (22.03.2018 and 07.06.2018) showing a positive organic surface-active agent (non-ionic) test with the sample in water giving 'translucent liquid with separation in two layers'. Two SCNs (13.08.2019 and 01.10.2020) proposed reclassification, duty with interest by invoking the extended period under Section 18(2) read with Section 28(4), confiscation under Sections 111(m)/111(o), and penalties under Sections 114A/112(a)&(b). The Principal Commissioner, by Order-in-Original dated 31.12.2021, upheld the importer's classification under CTI 3824 9090/9990 and dropped the proceedings, leading to this Revenue appeal and the importer's cross objection.
Key provisions
- Section 12, Customs Act, 1962 — Dutiable goods
- Section 111(o), Customs Act, 1962 — Confiscation of improperly imported goods etc
- Section 114A, Customs Act, 1962 — Penalty for short-levy or non-levy of duty in certain cases
- Section 28(4), Customs Act, 1962 — Recovery of duties not levied or not paid or short-levied or short- paid or erroneously refunded
- Section 3, Customs Tariff Act, 1975 — Levy of additional duty equal to excise duty, sales tax, local taxes and other charges
- Section 18(2), Customs Act, 1962 — Provisional assessment of duty
- Section 28AA, Customs Act, 1962 — Interest on delayed payment of duty