Case law

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal · 27 Mar 2024

Poonam Pundir vs C.C. Noida

Legal principle

Section 158 of the Customs Act, 1962 is an enabling rule-making provision under which no penalty can be directly imposed, and a warehouse licence cannot be cancelled on mere possibilities of intention without independent application of mind and due regard to proportionality.

Court decision

The appeal was partially allowed in favour of the appellant: the cancellation of the public warehouse licence was held unsustainable (the Tribunal found no merit in it), the penalty of Rs.2 lakhs under Section 158 was held unjustifiable and could not stand, and the penalty under Section 117 was reduced from Rs.3 lakhs to Rs.50,000, since admitted contraventions did exist and some penalty was warranted.

Facts

The appellant, Poonam Pundir, held a licence for a public bonded warehouse under Section 58 of the Customs Act, 1962. On scrutiny of space/re-warehouse certificate dated 10.01.2022, Export Processing Circle-I, Ghaziabad found non-duty-paid foreign liquor of M/s Meastro Spirit & Wine stored in the warehouse, with the warehouse and the importer sharing the same PAN (BWWPP2488Q) in the name of Poonam Pundir, Proprietor. Revenue treated storage of self-goods in a public bonded warehouse as contravention of Sections 57 and 58 read with Circular 26/2016 dated 09.06.2016. After an enquiry (report dated 04.05.2022), the Commissioner of Customs, Noida cancelled the public warehouse licence under Section 58B and imposed penalties of Rs.3,00,000 under Section 117 and Rs.2,00,000 under Section 158 of the Customs Act, 1962.

Key provisions