Case law

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal · 22 Dec 2023

Responsive Industries Ltd vs Commssioner Of Cgst & Central Excise…

Legal principle

A case of diversion of duty-exempt goods cannot be made out without evidence of the actual movement of the goods alleged to have been diverted, and standard input output norms (SION) are per-material ceilings or estimates, not mathematically precise formulae from which misuse of an exemption can be presumed.

Court decision

The Tribunal allowed the appeal of M/s Responsive Industries Ltd and dismissed the appeals of the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Palghar, holding that no part of the 'duty foregone' was recoverable: there was no evidence, even remotely proximate, that the PVC resin had reached any user/trader, and no ground to infer that it was used in excess of the adopted norms.

Facts

M/s Responsive Industries Ltd, an export oriented unit (EOU), procured 'polyvinyl chloride (PVC) resin' both from abroad and indigenously without payment of duty in terms of notification no. 52/2003-Cus dated 31st March 2003 (with the parallel excise notification no. 22/2003-CE). The department alleged diversion of this duty-exempt resin, and the Commissioner of Central Excise & CGST, Palghar, by Order-in-Original No. PLG-GST-COM-01/2020-21 dated 10th June 2020, proceeded to recover 'duty foregone', giving rise to cross-appeals by the company, the Commissioner, employees and transporters. The Revenue's charge rested on the procurement of 'plasticizer' not being in proportion to the procurement of PVC resin, implying that a lesser quantity of PVC resin was actually used in production.

Key provisions