Case law
Judgments from CESTAT, the High Courts and the Supreme Court, each summarised and linked to the provisions it applies.
Judgments powered by Indian Kanoon.
Madras High Court · 13 Jul 1990
A.K. Impex vs Union Of India
Legal principle
The order of a statutory functionary must stand or fall on the reasons disclosed in the order itself — its deficiency cannot be supplied by looking into departmental files — and an appeal or review under the Customs Act is incompetent unless the statutory requirements, including communication of the order, independent application of mind under Section 129D(2) and compliance with Rule 4 of the Customs (Appeals) Rules, 1982, are strictly observed.
Court decision
All the writ petitions were allowed: Order No. 606 of 1988 of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, Madras, dated 2-12-1988 was quashed, and the Collector of Customs, Madras, was directed to refund the redemption fine and personal penalty already paid by the petitioners; there was no order as to costs.
Facts
The petitioners imported in-shell almonds and sought clearance under an REP Licence as 'seeds' against Export Product G.2(i)(a) of Appendix 17 of the Import Trade Control Policy, supported by a State Horticulture Officer's certificate that the goods were seeds fit for germination and viable for sowing. The Customs House queried the claim on the view that almonds are dry fruits, a consumer item falling under S.No. 121 of Appendix 2B of the ITC Policy. The Deputy Collector held the imports were not covered by the REP licence, ordered confiscation under Section 111(d) with a redemption fine of 80% of c.i.f. value, but imposed no personal penalty. On review under Section 129D(2), the Collector of Customs directed the department to appeal under Section 129D(4), and the Collector (Appeals) enhanced the redemption fine to 200% of c.i.f. value and imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000 on each petitioner under Section 112(a). CEGAT, Madras, dismissed the petitioners' appeals, and they moved the Madras High Court under Article 226 for quashing the Tribunal's order and refund of the fine and penalty.
Key provisions
- Section 129D(2), Customs Act, 1962 — Powers of Committee of Principal Commissioner of Customs or Chief Commissioners of Customs or Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs to pass certain orders
- Section 153, Customs Act, 1962 — Modes for service of notice order etc
- Rule 4, Customs (Appeals) Rules, 1982 — Form of application to the [Commissioner] (Appeals)
- Section 129B(2), Customs Act, 1962 — Orders of Appellate Tribunal
- Section 111(d), Customs Act, 1962 — Confiscation of improperly imported goods etc
- Section 112(a), Customs Act, 1962 — Penalty for improper importation of goods